Best For Intermediate · 4 min read

Best AI for meeting summaries

Quick answer
For meeting summaries, use claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 for its superior summarization accuracy and context retention. gpt-4o is a strong alternative with robust API support and fast response times.

RECOMMENDATION

Use claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 for meeting summaries due to its leading accuracy and ability to handle long context windows effectively.
Use caseBest choiceWhyRunner-up
Short meeting summariesclaude-3-5-sonnet-20241022Best at concise, accurate summaries with minimal loss of contextgpt-4o
Long meeting transcriptsclaude-3-5-sonnet-20241022Handles large context windows and complex dialogue wellgemini-1.5-pro
Integration with existing workflowsgpt-4oStrong API ecosystem and SDK support for US developersclaude-3-5-sonnet-20241022
Cost-sensitive projectsgpt-4o-miniLower cost with reasonable summarization qualitymistral-small-latest
Multimodal meeting summaries (audio + text)gemini-1.5-flashSupports multimodal inputs for richer summariesgpt-4o

Top picks explained

claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 leads in meeting summary tasks due to its advanced understanding of dialogue nuances and ability to maintain context over long transcripts. gpt-4o offers excellent API support and speed, making it ideal for developers integrating summaries into apps. gemini-1.5-pro is notable for handling longer contexts and multimodal inputs, useful for complex meetings.

In practice

Here is a Python example using the Anthropic SDK with claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 to generate a meeting summary from a transcript.

python
import os
import anthropic

client = anthropic.Anthropic(api_key=os.environ["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"])

transcript = """Today we discussed project timelines, budget adjustments, and next steps for the marketing campaign..."""

response = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022",
    max_tokens=512,
    system="You are an expert meeting summarizer.",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": f"Summarize this meeting transcript concisely:\n{transcript}"}]
)

print(response.content[0].text)
output
Today’s meeting covered project timelines, budget adjustments, and next steps for the marketing campaign, focusing on key deliverables and deadlines.

Pricing and limits

OptionFreeCostLimitsContext window
claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022Free trial availableCheck pricing at Anthropic.comMax 100k tokens per requestUp to 100k tokens
gpt-4oFree trial available$0.03 / 1K tokens (prompt+completion)Max 32k tokens per requestUp to 32k tokens
gemini-1.5-proFree tier availableCheck pricing at Google CloudMax 64k tokens per requestUp to 64k tokens
gpt-4o-miniFree trial available$0.01 / 1K tokensMax 8k tokens per requestUp to 8k tokens

What to avoid

Avoid older or deprecated models like gpt-3.5-turbo or claude-2 as they lack the accuracy and context handling needed for quality meeting summaries. Also, steer clear of models with very small context windows (<8k tokens) for long meetings, as they truncate important details.

How to evaluate for your case

Test candidate models on your own meeting transcripts by measuring summary accuracy, completeness, and latency. Use a benchmark set of transcripts and compare outputs with human summaries. Automate evaluation with ROUGE or BERTScore metrics for objective comparison.

Key Takeaways

  • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 is the top choice for accurate, context-rich meeting summaries.
  • gpt-4o offers excellent integration and speed for developers.
  • Avoid models with small context windows for long or complex meetings.
  • Evaluate models on your own transcripts using automated metrics for best fit.
Verified 2026-04 · claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022, gpt-4o, gemini-1.5-pro, gpt-4o-mini
Verify ↗