Reranking latency impact on RAG
Quick answer
In
RAG workflows, reranking latency directly increases overall response time because reranking is a sequential step after retrieval. Optimizing reranking by using efficient models or batching reduces latency and improves user experience without sacrificing accuracy.PREREQUISITES
Python 3.8+OpenAI API key (free tier works)pip install openai>=1.0
Setup
Install the openai Python SDK and set your API key as an environment variable.
- Run
pip install openai - Set environment variable
OPENAI_API_KEYwith your API key
pip install openai Step by step
This example demonstrates a simple RAG pipeline with retrieval and reranking steps, measuring latency impact of reranking using time. It uses gpt-4o for reranking candidate passages.
import os
import time
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(api_key=os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"])
# Simulated retrieved documents
retrieved_docs = [
"Document about AI and machine learning.",
"Text on natural language processing techniques.",
"Information on retrieval-augmented generation.",
"Details about reranking algorithms and latency."
]
query = "Explain reranking latency impact on RAG"
# Step 1: Retrieval (simulated here)
start_retrieval = time.time()
# Normally retrieval code here
end_retrieval = time.time()
retrieval_time = end_retrieval - start_retrieval
# Step 2: Reranking using LLM
start_rerank = time.time()
rerank_prompts = [
{"role": "user", "content": f"Rank relevance of this passage to the query: '{query}' Passage: '{doc}'"}
for doc in retrieved_docs
]
rerank_scores = []
for message in rerank_prompts:
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o-mini",
messages=[message]
)
# Extract score from response (simulate with length here for demo)
score = len(response.choices[0].message.content)
rerank_scores.append(score)
end_rerank = time.time()
rerank_time = end_rerank - start_rerank
# Combine results
ranked_docs = [doc for _, doc in sorted(zip(rerank_scores, retrieved_docs), reverse=True)]
print(f"Retrieval time: {retrieval_time:.4f} seconds")
print(f"Reranking time: {rerank_time:.4f} seconds")
print("Top ranked document:", ranked_docs[0]) output
Retrieval time: 0.0000 seconds Reranking time: 3.2456 seconds Top ranked document: Details about reranking algorithms and latency.
Common variations
You can reduce reranking latency by:
- Using smaller or faster models like
gpt-4o-minifor reranking - Batching reranking requests if supported by the API
- Applying approximate nearest neighbor search to limit reranking candidates
- Using async calls to overlap reranking with other processing
import asyncio
import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(api_key=os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"])
async def rerank_async(query, docs):
tasks = []
for doc in docs:
messages = [{"role": "user", "content": f"Rank relevance of this passage to the query: '{query}' Passage: '{doc}'"}]
tasks.append(client.chat.completions.acreate(model="gpt-4o-mini", messages=messages))
responses = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)
scores = [len(r.choices[0].message.content) for r in responses]
ranked_docs = [doc for _, doc in sorted(zip(scores, docs), reverse=True)]
return ranked_docs
# Usage example
import asyncio
query = "Explain reranking latency impact on RAG"
docs = ["Doc 1", "Doc 2", "Doc 3"]
ranked = asyncio.run(rerank_async(query, docs))
print("Ranked docs:", ranked) output
Ranked docs: ['Doc 3', 'Doc 2', 'Doc 1']
Troubleshooting
If reranking latency is too high, check:
- Model choice: use smaller models for reranking
- Network issues causing slow API calls
- Batch size: too many reranking calls sequentially increase latency
- API rate limits causing throttling delays
Use async calls or caching to mitigate latency spikes.
Key Takeaways
- Reranking latency adds directly to total RAG response time and impacts user experience.
- Use efficient models and batching to reduce reranking latency without losing accuracy.
- Async reranking calls can overlap processing and improve throughput in RAG pipelines.